can women have it all?

March 25th, 2006

Women can’t have it all. We’ve been sold a lie that we can effectively juggle both family and career, and our mothers bought it, hook, line and sinker. However, today’s woman knows better.

In the wake of Betty Freidan’s death on February 4, unanswered questions remain — questions highlighted by Freidan’s activism in the 1970’s that started what many call the second wave of feminism, questions about women’s role in society and what it means to be a woman, questions that every woman has to face in today’s fast-paced, post-feminist world.

Society is still reeling from the effects of the modern feminist movement propelled by Freidan’s book The Feminine Mystique. While we can thank Freidan and other activists for many of the freedoms we enjoy today as women, we should also be aware that many of Freidan’s liberating ideologies are not so liberating after-all. Presupposing the assumption that women who are homemakers, wives, and mothers are somehow not all that they can be, the underlying message has hurt a generation of children and has resulted in a generation of stressed, burned-out mothers trying to juggle family and career.

Women should have the choice to pursue a career or to stay at home with their kids; but the feminism propagated by Freidan failed to acknowledge that some women want to be stay-at-home moms. To deny the value of a woman’s choice misses the whole point of the feminist movement – to give women the freedom to choose and be proud of their choices.

Thus, in the spirit of “choice,” women find themselves today on the opposite end of the pendulum from their mothers in the 1950’s; instead of being expected to be a homemaker and raise children, women are now expected to be super-moms while simultaneously pursuing careers.

Yes, many advancements have been achieved in the name of egalitarianism – the push for equal pay, gender-neutral want ads, the ability to pursue a career, etc. – but there is still very little “choice” for a woman who chooses to have a family; she is either looked down upon by society if she chooses to forgo working outside the home or she is obligated to try to be “super-mom” while juggling a career in a working world that is not “mom-friendly.”

Today’s women are realizing the reality of which they were never forewarned — that they must either pledge their allegiance to a career or a family but that they cannot successfully do both without sacrificing their quality of life and their well-being, not to mention their family’s.

Is it possible to work fulltime and raise well-balanced, healthy children who are rooted in love? Yes. But it is very difficult, and usually, by choosing to do so, a woman sacrifices her career, for her attention is necessarily divided. Today’s woman cannot pursue the corporate ladder full tilt while being fully involved in her children’s lives. To believe she can is to buy into the lie and will only leave her unsatisfied when she realizes she is not able to give either domain her full attention.

Thus in the wake of a generation of children who grew up with both parents working, the next generation of women are realizing that the system isn’t working. Exhausted, harried, overwhelmed — women are now bucking the status quo and are, in fact, demanding true choice — the choice to pursue a career or the choice to be a mother without having to give justification for not working “outside the home.”

Freidan, in an attempt to free women, effectively tightened their chains, replacing one set with another. How did we so easily swing from one end of the spectrum to the other and miss the point of choice?

By finally realizing the lies surrounding Freidan-feminism, we, as women, can confidentially assert our right to choose – to either pursue careers or to pursue being mothers and not have to stretch ourselves thin trying to do both because society dictates that we must.

7 Responses to “can women have it all?”

  1. Katie Says:

    I was just talking with my friend who is a self-proclaimed “feminist.” That can mean a variety of things these days, and I’m still struggling to figure out what she means by that.

    My take on the feminist movement (meaning the Friedan-inspired, 1960’s full-force assault on traditional roles) is that it was intense because things were so unbalanced. When people begin to percieve that our society is holding out on a particular group, or worse, discriminating– there’s a passionate backlash.

    I think that Friedan-esqe feminists gave an extreme response to what society had become. Yes, the world was changing and women needed the option to be educated, paid the same as men, and to be something other than a wife and mother. But the feminist movement went to the other extreme and seemed to say that career over family is the only good choice, and that men’s inherent goal is to subvert women.

    Now, I think things are coming into more of a balance. We’re seeing that although very real and radical, this movement wasn’t realistic. Women can’t– and aren’t intended to “have it all.” And, very few men are able to “share equally” in household chores. The division of labor isn’t working out quite like the women had intended, and thus they’re burned out and not doing anything well!

    I wonder if this shouldn’t be the pattern for a lot of social movements. Initial passion causes the activists to reject the status quo and run furiously in the other direction. Naturally after time, things are brought more into balance… (Sometimes we never find the balance and thus real, effective change never occurs)

  2. Moriah Joy Says:

    Thanks, Katie! I agree with your analysis. I think we’re in a period of trying to correct the thrust of the Friedan-feminism ideologies and are realizing that many of the tenets that drove that movement are collapsing, having no foundation.

  3. Misunderstood project Says:

    Wow your blog kicked so much ass. I have added it to my bookmarks and am planning to visit back in the future! You can checkout my blog at the link below.

  4. Xavier Says:

    I was looking for crucial information on this subject. The information was important as I am about to launch my own portal. Thanks for providing a missing link in my business.

  5. Prescription Meds Says:

    You made some good points there. I did a search on the topic and found most people will agree with your opinion.

  6. Online Medications Says:

    I know this is really boring and you are skipping to the next comment, but I just wanted to throw you a big thanks - you cleared up some things for me!

  7. Online Meds Says:

    Hi, I can’t understand how to add your site in my rss reader. Can you help me, please :)

Leave a Reply